Patentability & Prior-Art Search
Targeted databases + manual review. Output is a clear matrix of references vs. features with an opinion on patentability and filing approach.
We draft the way examiners read—clean structure, consistent terminology, and defensible scope. From patentability searches to FER replies and coordinated filings under India, PCT, and foreign jurisdictions, the focus is protection that actually holds.
End-to-end patent support—from idea capture to grant and beyond.
Targeted databases + manual review. Output is a clear matrix of references vs. features with an opinion on patentability and filing approach.
Freedom-to-Operate analysis and competitive mapping to guide design-around decisions and reduce downstream litigation risk.
Claims-first approach with proper antecedents and consistent terminology. Detailed embodiments, alternatives, and examples to support scope.
Strategy for PCT timing, priority, and national-phase entry. Coordinated filings in US/EU/UK and other jurisdictions through trusted associates.
Structured responses that address objections head-on—novelty, inventive step, §3(k)/software, clarity, and formalities—backed by amendments where needed.
Pre-grant / post-grant oppositions, claim charting, licensing support, and portfolio pruning for quality over quantity.
Note: We don’t pad portfolios. If the case is weak, we say so and suggest fixes or alternatives.
Straightforward flow. Predictable outputs.
Intake under NDA. Define problem, solution, differentiators, and jurisdictions.
Patentability/FTO with a concise opinion and filing plan. If it’s not worth filing yet, we’ll say it.
Claims-first. Consistent terms. Examples and alternatives that support scope and future amendments.
India, PCT, and selected foreign filings with clean forms, drawings, and figure selections.
FER responses, hearings as needed, targeted amendments, and clear status reporting.
Exact dates depend on your facts and the office. We’ll map them before filing.
India as home base, with PCT and selected foreign filings through reliable associates.
Provisional/complete filings, examination, FER handling, hearings, and oppositions.
International phase strategy and clean national-phase entry packages.
US counsel coordination on §101/§102/§103/§112 issues and claim drafting nuances.
EPO practice alignment on problem–solution and added-matter sensitivities.
UKIPO filings coordinated for targeted protection and enforcement options.
On request: CA, AU, SG, and GCC region via partner firms.
If it’s on your mind, it’s probably here.
We look at readiness. If the core is solid but testing is pending, we file provisional to lock the date and plan the complete with stronger data. If the invention is mature, we go straight to complete and align it with foreign plans.
Yes. We highlight technical character and real-world effect, structure claims away from pure algorithms, and support with system/flow embodiments. If it won’t pass, we’ll say so early.
A short, readable brief: references vs. features matrix, commentary on novelty/inventive step, and a filing recommendation. No jargon for the sake of it.
Yes. Provide sketches/exports and we’ll standardize them to patent-office conventions, with consistent labels and figure sequencing.
We share a scoped quote before we start—broken into searches, drafting, filing, and prosecution. No surprises mid-way.
Send the disclosure under NDA or use our intake form. We’ll map the strategy and timelines up front.